|
|
||||||||
|
by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine J Ultrasound Med 27:159-160 0278-4297
An Unusual Cause of Hydrocele: Malpositioned Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in the Scrotum lu, MDDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara, Turkey To the Editor: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are commonly used surgical materials used for treatment of cerebrospinal fluid circulation disorders. Although it is widely used and a relatively safe procedure, shunt placement may also give rise to several potential complications. Migrations of VP shunts to several body compartments, including the mediastinum, chest, abdominal wall, gastrointestinal tract, and scrotum, have been reported.1 Here we present the sonographic findings of a patient with scrotal migration of a VP shunt. We think that sonography should be the imaging modality of choice for patients when clinical suspicion of scrotal shunt migration exists.
A 14-month-old boy was admitted to the emergency department with a high-grade fever and confusion. His mother stated that he was in good health until the day before the admission, and in the last 24 hours, the patient gradually deteriorated both mentally and physically, and the high-grade fever developed. The patients medical history was remarkable for myelomeningocele and VP shunt placement. On physical examination, the patient was found to be obtunded with questionable nuchal rigidity. The patient was immediately given antibiotic treatment, and a lumbar puncture was performed to detect the possible pathogenic agent. On the following days of his admission, abdominal pain developed, and his high-grade fever persisted (albeit not as high as on the day of admission). On physical examination, the house officer of the floor detected mild abdominal distension and swelling of the left hemiscrotum. Abdominal sonographic examination of the patient was not optimal because of prominent distension of the bowel segments and lack of patient cooperation. A subsequent scrotal sonographic examination showed the VP shunt catheter ends in the right hemiscrotum with a resultant hydrocele. The shunt catheter was also clearly seen throughout the inguinal canal with surrounding fluid (Figure 1
A nonobliterated processus vaginalis is regarded as the characteristic abnormality of this phenomenon. The embryologic process of the processus vaginalis is complex, and it may remain open in 60% to 70% of infants in the first 3 months of life and in 50% to 60% of infants in the first year. This patency may be observed even during adulthood in 15% to 30% of healthy individuals.2 The role of inflammation in the sustained patency of the weak parts of the peritoneum, such as the processus vaginalis, may also be a contributing factor.3 Data on the treatment of these malpositioned VP shunts suggest the efficacy and positive effects of early treatment, and an increased risk of incarceration may be decreased as well.4 Finally, we think that sonography may be a highly effective and accurate imaging modality for assessment of hydroceles and scrotal swelling in patients with VP shunts, sparing the infants from other potentially harmful x-ray–based modalities.
References
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |