JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Petty, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Petty, C. N.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 9, Issue 12 717-723, Copyright © 1990 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination

B. S. Mahony, D. A. Nyberg, D. A. Luthy, J. H. Hirsch, D. E. Hickok and C. N. Petty
Department of Ultrasound, Swedish Hospital Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

This prospective blinded study compared translabial ultrasound (TLU) and digital palpation of the cervix among women whose cervix could not be visualized adequately or at all with transabdominal ultrasound during the third trimester of pregnancy. The cervical canal and internal cervical os were adequately visualized during 109 of 113 TLUs (96%). The TLU was well tolerated by the patients; only two patients refused the TLU pending discussion of the technique with their obstetrician. Among 43 examinations of patients without clinical cervical effacement, TLU showed a cervical length of 2.5 to 4.2 cm (mean, 2.9 cm). An excellent correlation (R = 0.90) was noted between cervical length on TLU and percentage of cervical effacement on digital examination. The correlation between amount of cervical dilatation on TLU and on digital examination was not high (R = 0.58). We conclude that the measurements of cervical length on TLU correlate well with the amount of cervical effacement on digital examination and that TLU provides a rapid and well-tolerated alternative technique to visualize the third-trimester uterine cervix.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Zilianti, B. S. Hertzberg, and M. A. Kliewer
Transperineal Versus Transvaginal Sonography During Pregnancy
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2002; 21(1): 101 - 102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
D. B. CARR, K. SMITH, L. PARSONS, K. CHANSKY, and L. E. SHIELDS
Ultrasonography for Cervical Length Measurement: Agreement Between Transvaginal and Translabial Techniques
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2000; 96(4): 554 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
J. D. Ruffin, J. Pearson, and K. T. Woods
The Fundamentals of Transperineal Ultrasound
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1992; 8(4): 188 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.