JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whiteley, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whiteley, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, R. M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 8, Issue 11 621-630, Copyright © 1989 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ultrasonographic appearance of primary and metastatic canine hepatic tumors. A review of 48 cases

M. B. Whiteley, D. A. Feeney, L. O. Whiteley and R. M. Hardy
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108.

Forty-eight cases of dogs with primary and metastatic hepatic neoplasia were reviewed to determine if a predictable relationship between sonographic appearance and neoplastic cell type could be found. A focal mass was almost always a hepatocellular carcinoma (14 of 15) and 71% of these were hyperechoic. Focal or multifocal hyperechoic masses were most likely to be carcinomas (14 of 15). Focal or multifocal mixed neoplasms were most likely to be carcinomas (6 of 7). Two distinct patterns of lymphosarcoma were found: diffuse, mildly hyperechoic (6/11) and multifocal, hypoechoic (5/11). No neoplastic cell-type predictions could be made for focal or multifocal hypoechoic lesions. Diffuse fine or coarse patterns with minimal architectural distortions could be mistaken for normal or degenerative processes. However, in the presence of increased serum liver enzyme values, these subtle sonographic changes would warrant a liver biopsy to differentiate neoplastic infiltrate from non-neoplastic infiltrative and degenerative processes.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.