JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbins, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cullen, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hobbins, J. C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 8, Issue 10 565-569, Copyright © 1989 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of transvaginal and abdominal ultrasound in visualizing the first trimester conceptus

M. T. Cullen, J. J. Green, E. A. Reece and J. C. Hobbins
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.

Ultrasound visualization of the first trimester embryo was compared using abdominal and transvaginal sonography. The parameters evaluated included the ability to obtain biometry, the ability to visualize detailed internal anatomy, and a subjective assessment of the overall image clarity. In 120 patients studied, transvaginal sonography was superior to abdominal sonography in obtaining biometric measurements in 51 cases (43%) and for visualizing internal anatomy in 45 cases (38%); also the image clarity of transvaginal sonography was subjectively better in 75 cases (63%). Vaginal sonography was superior to abdominal sonography in gestations less than or equal to 10 weeks, in obese patients, and in patients with retroverted uteri. The major difficulty encountered with transvaginal sonography was the limited maneuverability of the probe to generate specific views. Vaginal sonography can be a valuable tool in imaging the first trimester fetus, complementing, not replacing, abdominal sonography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. S. Bae, C. E. Barnewolt, and R. W. Jennings
Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Differences of the Hand and Upper Limb
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_4): 31 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
I. E. Timor-Tritsch
As Technology Evolves, So Should Its Application: Shortcomings of the "18-Week Anatomy Scan"
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 423 - 428.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. A. Smith and D. M. Sherer
Endovaginal Sonographic Diagnosis of Fetal Cystic Hygroma at 10 Weeks' Gestation
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 99 - 100.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.