JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreotti, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Zusmer, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreotti, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Zusmer, N. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 8, Issue 10 555-560, Copyright © 1989 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Endovaginal and transabdominal sonography of ovarian follicles

R. F. Andreotti, G. H. Thompson, W. Janowitz, A. G. Shapiro and N. R. Zusmer
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida 33140.

Endovaginal and transabdominal sonography (EVS and TAS, respectively) are effective methods for monitoring ovarian follicular development. Our study evaluates both modalities by subjective comparisons and objective correlations with serum estradiol levels. In 21 of 41 studies, TVS showed more follicles over 1 cm than did TAS. The same number was seen by both in 17 studies and more by TAS in only 3 studies. Margins of the follicles were sharply defined in 37 of 41 EVS studies (90%) but only in 18 of 41 TAS studies (41%). In each of the 4 cases in which follicles were not sharply defined by EVS the ovaries were located high in the pelvis. In 29 sonographic studies, there were corresponding estradiol levels. The number and size of dominant follicles correlated well with estradiol levels (r = .9074) for EVS but less so (r = .3816) for TAS. EVS has several advantages when monitoring follicular development.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. R. Baerwald, G. P. Adams, and R. A. Pierson
Characterization of Ovarian Follicular Wave Dynamics in Women
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 1023 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.