JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, R. J.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 8, Issue 1 25-29, Copyright © 1989 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The ideal fetal head circumference calculation

A. B. Kurtz and R. J. Kurtz
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

Various formulas have been employed to compute the circumference of an ellipse. These formulas can be separated into three groups: formulas for a circle, formulas for an incorrect ellipse, and a very complicated formula for a correct ellipse. The errors caused by the first two groups are termed systematic because they occur every time that one of these formulas is used. When measuring fetal head circumference, the errors increase as the fetal head is more ellipsoid, becoming more than 1% when the ratio of the biparietal to fronto-occipital diameter decreases to less than .70. Near term, when the fetal head is large, this could create an error in predicting gestational age of almost .8 weeks. The third group is associated with mathematical random errors because of the difficulty in using a cumbersome equation. All of these formulas and their shortcomings are analyzed. A calculation for the correct circumference of an ellipse is proposed using the simple formula for a circle times a correction factor. The correction factor depends solely on the ratio of the biparietal to fronto-occipital diameter. This formula should minimize random errors and eliminate systematic errors in the calculation of fetal head circumference and will permit a more accurate analysis of fetal age.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
B. Hearn-Stebbins
Normal Fetal Growth Assessment: A Review of Literature and Current Practice
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1995; 11(4): 176 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.