JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lonky, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lonky, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, M. G.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 8, Issue 1 15-19, Copyright © 1989 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Prediction of cesarean section scars with ultrasound imaging during pregnancy

N. M. Lonky, N. Worthen and M. G. Ross
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, California.

We sought to determine whether a sonographic examination could identify uterine scars in patients with a history of previous cesarean section and further distinguish patients having previous low transverse from vertical uterine incisions. Forty-six antenatal obstetrical patients with a history of prior cesarean section(s) and 30 control patients without prior uterine surgery underwent sonogram examinations to identify the scar. The researcher who later reviewed the sonogram was blinded as to the presence or type of uterine scar. Of the 47 scars examined, uterine scars were visualized in 13 (27.7%). All scars seen were low transverse; no vertical scars were identified by sonography (p less than .05). No scars were visualized with sonography in the control group and cesarean section scars were seen more easily prior to the third trimester. No information concerning the scar condition (dehiscence) could be obtained with sonography. We conclude it is of benefit to perform sonogram exams in patients with prior cesarean sections of unknown incision to better counsel them as to their risk to rupture. Although vertical cesarean section scars could not be visualized, those patients who had low transverse scars identified could be included in a low-risk vaginal birth population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
V. Y. T. Cheung, O. C. Constantinescu, and B. S. Ahluwalia
Sonographic Evaluation of the Lower Uterine Segment in Patients With Previous Cesarean Delivery
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2004; 23(11): 1441 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. Sambaziotis, C. Conway, R. Figueroa, A. Elimian, and D. Garry
Second-Trimester Sonographic Comparison of the Lower Uterine Segment in Pregnant Women With and Without a Previous Cesarean Delivery
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 907 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. S. Erickson and B. J. Van Voorhis
INTERMENSTRUAL BLEEDING SECONDARY TO CESAREAN SCAR DIVERTICULI: REPORT OF THREE CASES
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 1999; 93(5): 802 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.