JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rempen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rempen, A.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 7, Issue 7 381-387, Copyright © 1988 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Vaginal sonography in ectopic pregnancy. A prospective evaluation

A. Rempen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wurzburg, West Germany.

Among 404 first-trimester pregnancies examined with vaginal sonography in a prospective study, there were 21 ectopic gestations. Considering only the initial scans, the endometrial canal showed a linear echo surrounded by an echogenic zone in 18 cases, but in three cases the uterine cavity demonstrated a small echo-free area representing blood. Free fluid within the cul-de-sac was seen in 17 patients. An adnexal tumor representing the extrauterine gestation, was detected in 19 cases. Fifteen of these masses exhibited a thick-walled ring characteristic of a gestational sac with a viable embryo in five cases and a yolk sac in one. Other cystic adnexal masses, such as corpus luteum cysts, seen in 14 of the 21 patients were not confused with the ectopic pregnancy. A correct tentative diagnosis of ectopic gestation was made in 18 patients (86%) after the initial scan and in 20 cases (95%) including four controls. There was one false-positive suspicion of ectopic gestation in a patient who actually had a spontaneous abortion. Interpretation of the sonographic image should generally be done in correlation with laboratory and clinical data. The results of the study indicate that vaginal sonography is a valuable diagnostic procedure in the evaluation for ectopic pregnancy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H. L. Cohen and W. H. Moore
History of Emergency Ultrasound
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 451 - 458.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. A. Kory, B. S. Hertzberg, M. A. Kliewer, and J. D. Bowie
Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175 (4): 1185 - 1186.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
D. Faustin, D. Halio, R. Shiffman, L. Flaxman, and J. Castro
Preoperative Diagnosis of Third Trimester Abdominal Pregnancy by Transvaginal Ultrasound
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1992; 8(2): 89 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
N. M. Damato
Endovaginal versus Transabdomrin Sonograh: A Comparison of Adnexal Masses
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1990; 6(2): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.