JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Samuel, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feldberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Samuel, N.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 7, Issue 6 339-343, Copyright © 1988 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Transvaginal oocyte retrieval controlled by vaginal probe for in vitro fertilization: a comparative study

D. Feldberg, J. A. Goldman, J. Ashkenazi, M. Shelef, D. Dicker and N. Samuel
Sherman Fertility Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Golda Meir Medical Center, (Hasharon Hospital), Petah Tikva, Israel.

Of 142 patients who initiated in vitro fertilization cycles, 52 underwent oocyte collection by laparoscopy, 58 by the ultrasonically guided transvesical route, both under general or local anesthesia and 36 by the ultrasonically transvaginal route under local anesthesia. When the three methods were compared the results did not differ significantly. An average of 6.4, 6.2, and 5.7 oocytes, respectively, were retrieved. Cleavage rates were 82.6, 79.4, and 81.6%, respectively, while 20.2, 22.6, and 21.1% clinical pregnancies per cycle were obtained. Complications with this procedure such as exacerbation of previous pelvic inflammatory disease, urinary tract infections, transient hematuria, and mild hemoperitoneum were rare. In general, patients greatly preferred the transvaginal method. In addition to providing greater comfort for the patient, this method requires no general anesthesia and is less expensive than other methods. Our initial experience demonstrates that in vitro fertilization can be performed successfully through this simplified alternative to oocyte retrieval.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.