JUM AIUM Career Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claflin, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Werner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Claflin, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Werner, S.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 7, Issue 6 311-315, Copyright © 1988 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cardiac output determinations in the newborn. Reproducibility of the pulsed Doppler velocity measurement

K. S. Claflin, D. C. Alverson, D. Pathak, P. Angelus, C. Backstrom and S. Werner
Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

Cardiac output (QAo) can be estimated noninvasively by pulsed Doppler (PD) ultrasonographic determination of mean ascending aortic blood flow velocity (VAo) combined with M-mode echocardiographic determination of ascending aortic cross sectional area (AAo). Cardiac output is calculated from the volumetric flow equation (QAo) = (VAo) X (AAo). Pulsed Doppler measurements are known to correlate well with Fick and thermodilution methods; however, inter- and intraoperator variability of the velocity component of the PD method has not been determined in newborns. We did three repeated PD measures of mean aortic flow velocity in ten term infants (using four trained operators) to determine inter- and intraoperator reproducibility. The coefficient of variation for intraoperator variability (random error) for a single measurement of VAo was 11.7%. If three repeated measures by a single operator were averaged, the random error was 7.0%. There was little interoperator variability found.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A M Groves, C A Kuschel, D B Knight, and J R Skinner
Relationship between blood pressure and blood flow in newborn preterm infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F29 - F32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A M Groves, C A Kuschel, D B Knight, and J R Skinner
Echocardiographic assessment of blood flow volume in the superior vena cava and descending aorta in the newborn infant
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F24 - F28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S M Tibby and I A Murdoch
Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M. Kluckow and N. Evans
Superior vena cava flow in newborn infants: a novel marker of systemic blood flow
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2000; 82(3): 182F - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.