JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zador, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chik, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zador, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chik, L.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 7, Issue 5 245-249, Copyright © 1988 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Interobserver variability. A source of error in obstetric ultrasound

I. E. Zador, R. J. Sokol and L. Chik
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48201.

Several sources of error encountered in obstetrical ultrasound examination have been analyzed from a computerized ultrasound database. The variability in measuring fetal landmarks and visualization of fetal structures were found to be significantly different among three registered sonographers who examined 1,410 consecutive second and third trimester patients. The rate of successful measurement of biparietal diameter (BPD) and average abdominal diameter (AAD), as well as successful visualization of fetal stomach and/or kidneys were statistically different among the three sonographers. Only the fetal femur length was consistently measured by all three sonographers. The bias in terms of actual millimeters measured was significantly different for both BPD and AAD. The bias related to the BPD was in the magnitude of 1 mm, while the bias related to the AAD was almost 3 mm. The clinical significance of these findings and the value of the computer to perform periodic checks to assure quality control in a busy ultrasound service are discussed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.