JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andolf, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andolf, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 7, Issue 11 617-620, Copyright © 1988 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A prospective comparison of clinical ultrasound and operative examination of the female pelvis

E. Andolf and C. Jorgensen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

The value and accuracy of ultrasound examination in patients with gynecological disease is still controversial. Patients scheduled for elective surgery participated in a "blind" ultrasound examination the day before. Findings at surgery were compared with those of ultrasound and of manual examination. Ultrasound was superior to clinical examination in terms of sensitivity (83% and 67%, respectively), whereas specificity was similar for both methods (96% and 94%, respectively). Neither ultrasound nor clinical exam was reliable in detecting tubal anomalies, whereas small solid lesions were missed by sonography and larger cystic lesions by manual exam. Ultrasound would seem to be superior in overall performance, and a useful complement to palpatory exam.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
Y.-Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater, and H. K. Kang
Imaging Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1445 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.