JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hays, D.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hays, D.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, R. M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 6, Issue 2 71-73, Copyright © 1987 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of fetal biometric ratios to neonatal morphometrics

D. Hays and R. M. Patterson

Ratios of fetal abdominal circumference to femur length (AC/FL) and thigh circumference to femur length (TC/FL) have been suggested as indices of fetal nutrition. Birthweight, skin-fold thickness, and ponderal index are accepted neonatal indices of nutrition. The purpose of this study was to compare fetal to neonatal indices of nutrition. In 52 patients in term labor, fetal abdominal circumference, thigh circumference, and femur length were measured ultrasonographically. Neonatal skin-fold thickness was calculated as the average of tricipital, subscapular, abdominal, and anterior thigh measurements determined with Harpenden skin-fold calipers. Linear correlation analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between AC/FL and ponderal index (r = 0.340, P = 0.028) and between TC/FL and ponderal index (r = 0.368, P = 0.007). Neither AC/FL nor TC/FL were significantly related to birthweight or skin-fold thickness. These data suggest that the diagnostic reliability of antenatal studies of fetal biometric ratios may be enhanced by using the ponderal index as a neonatal endpoint rather than birthweight or skin-fold thickness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Matsumoto, T. Yanagihara, and T. Hata
Three-dimensional qualitative sonographic evaluation of fetal soft tissue
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2438 - 2442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.