JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wikland, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granberg, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wikland, M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 6, Issue 11 649-653, Copyright © 1987 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison between endovaginal and transabdominal transducers for measuring ovarian volume

S. Granberg and M. Wikland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Goteborg, Sweden.

The use of ultrasound for measuring ovarian volume has attracted increasing interest in recent years, as it appears to be a valuable technique for identifying tumors in certain risk groups for ovarian carcinoma. Although in all studies performed to date a transabdominal scanning technique has been used, endovaginal sonography seems more promising for studying the ovaries. The aim of this study is to make a comparison between transabdominal and endovaginal scanning of the ovaries. The study was performed in 17 women with regular menstruation and 11 postmenopausal women. Although no significant difference in ovarian volume was found in comparison of measurements made using an endovaginal and a transabdominal transducer, a much clearer image of the ovaries was obtained with the endovaginal transducer. This scanning technique also seems to be better accepted by the patients since it does not require that the bladder be full. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
N. M. Damato
Endovaginal versus Transabdomrin Sonograh: A Comparison of Adnexal Masses
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1990; 6(2): 92 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.