JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperberg, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooperberg, P. L.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 6, Issue 10 589-595, Copyright © 1987 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Intraoperative imaging of the biliary tree. Sonography vs. operative cholangiography

A. R. Buckley, C. H. Scudamore, C. D. Becker and P. L. Cooperberg
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

The accepted technique for diagnosing choledocholithiasis at the time of cholecystectomy is operative cholangiography. Reports in the surgical literature suggest that intraoperative ultrasound can replace operative cholangiography in the accurate detection of common duct stones. This prospective study was performed jointly by radiologists and surgeons together in the operating room. Twenty-one patients underwent intraoperative ultrasonography and operative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy. In the 16 cases in which both studies were adequate, there were 11 in which no stones were seen on either; three in which stones were seen on both; and two in which stones were diagnosed by sonography alone. In one of these latter cases, the stones were confirmed, making the cholangiogram falsely negative. In the other case, no stones were found so we presume that sonography was falsely positive. Although this technique can be accurate and useful, it is technically demanding, even for an experienced sonologist. We feel that this technique is likely to be of benefit only to the surgeon with considerable ultrasound training, expertise, and motivation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.