JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patten, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nyberg, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Patten, R. M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 6, Issue 1 23-27, Copyright © 1987 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Distinguishing normal from abnormal gestational sac growth in early pregnancy

D. A. Nyberg, L. A. Mack, F. C. Laing and R. M. Patten

In order to evaluate normal and abnormal gestational sac development, serial sonograms were performed in 83 women whose initial sonogram demonstrated a gestational sac lacking a detectable embryo. Of 53 normal gestations, the mean sac growth was 1.13 mm/day (range, 0.71-1.75). In comparison, of 30 abnormal gestations, 24 demonstrated sac growth, and of these, the mean growth was 0.70 mm/day (range, 0.14-1.71). Based on these observations, we suggest that gestational sac growth of less than or equal to 0.6 mm/day is evidence for abnormal development. Analysis of the initial and follow-up scans for the 53 normal gestations showed that a living embryo was always detected when the mean gestational sac was greater than 25 mm in average diameter, and a yolk sac was always seen when the mean sac diameter was greater than 20 mm. In comparison, of 30 abnormal gestations, six were greater than 25 mm without a detectable embryo, and four were greater than 20 mm without a yolk sac. Recommendations for the optimal time of a follow-up sonogram are presented based on the initial sac size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Odeh, Y. Hirsh, S. Degani, V. Grinin, E. Ofir, and J. Bornstein
Three-Dimensional Sonographic Volumetry of the Gestational Sac and the Amniotic Sac in the First Trimester
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2008; 27(3): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. D. Creinin, X. Huang, C. Westhoff, K. Barnhart, J. M. Gilles, J. Zhang, and for the National Institute of Child Health and Hum
Factors Related to Successful Misoprostol Treatment for Early Pregnancy Failure.
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2006; 107(4): 901 - 907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Zhang, J. M. Gilles, K. Barnhart, M. D. Creinin, C. Westhoff, M. M. Frederick, and the National Institute of Child Health !Human Deve
A Comparison of Medical Management with Misoprostol and Surgical Management for Early Pregnancy Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., August 25, 2005; 353(8): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.