JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wan, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wan, M. C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 5, Issue 8 453-457, Copyright © 1986 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

An evaluation of fetal weight prediction using a simple equation containing the fetal femur length

J. S. Woo and M. C. Wan

The accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation based on five published regression equations and two new equations generated from data at the authors' institution was evaluated on 41 small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses and 57 appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) fetuses. Equations which contained the fetal femur length (FL) in addition to the biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference (AC) yielded lower systematic and random errors in the SGA group but not in the AGA group. These findings support the contention that consideration of the FL is important in sonographic estimation of fetal weight in the growth-retarded fetus as head and limb growth may be affected to different degrees in different fetuses. A new equation, where birthweight in grams = 1.4 X (BPD(cm) X AC(cm) X FL(cm)) - 200, was developed which had a standard deviation of 98 g/kg in SGA fetuses and 68 g/kg in AGA fetuses. This equation yielded significantly lower random errors in the SGA but not in the AGA fetuses when compared with another linear equation without the FL. The new model is simple and practical to use, which makes it a viable alternative to more elaborate models containing three parameters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Scioscia, A. Vimercati, O. Ceci, M. Vicino, and L. E. Selvaggi
Estimation of Birth Weight by Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography: A Critical Appraisal of Its Accuracy
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2008; 111(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.