JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raiss, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raiss, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, B. F.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 5, Issue 8 439-444, Copyright © 1986 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Further observations in the ultrasound evaluation of renal allograft rejection

G. J. Raiss, R. L. Bree, R. E. Schwab, S. R. Schultz, N. G. Salem and B. F. Rosenberg

In order to determine whether sonographic parenchymal changes and volume changes are reliable predictors of acute transplant rejection, 36 recipients of renal allografts were studied. The significance of graft volume changes was evaluated, since most previous studies have not utilized routine immediate postoperative baseline scans for comparison to follow-up scans. All patients had baseline scans within 24 hours of the transplant. All 24 acute rejection patients had biopsy proof of rejection within three days of the follow-up scans. Seven clinically normal and five clinically designated acute tubular necrosis (ATN) patients were studied for comparison. A retrospective blind review utilizing three sonologists and previously described criteria combined with calculated volume changes demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 85 per cent and specificity of 94 per cent for the detection of acute rejection. The kidneys with acute rejection had an average volume increase of 73 per cent vs. 27 per cent for ATN patients and 24 per cent for normal patients, a statistically significant difference.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. M. de Gaetano, G. Boldrini, G. Nanni, F. Serino, I. Giovannini, and M. Castagneto
Noninvasive Surveillance of Allografted Kidneys by Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning
Angiology, August 1, 1989; 40(8): 705 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.