JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Callen, P. W.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 4, Issue 6 307-310, Copyright © 1985 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonography, a complementary examination to alpha-fetoprotein testing for fetal neural tube defects

B. E. Hashimoto, B. S. Mahony, R. A. Filly, M. S. Golbus, R. L. Anderson and P. W. Callen

Neural tube defects (NTDs) are among the most common congenital anomalies in the United States, with an estimated prevalence of 16 per 10,000 births. The measurement of amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein (AF-AFP) concentration has been used to detect NTDs since the early 1970s. When the AF-AFP concentration is elevated, ultrasonography is commonly used to confirm the presence of a NTD. In this study, patient charts, amniocentesis records, and ultrasound reports from a three-year period were reviewed. The 97 fetuses identified as being at high risk for NTDs were divided into four groups: those with high AF-AFP concentrations (Groups 1 and 2, with from 3 to 5 standard deviations (SD) above the mean and with more than 5 SD above the mean, respectively): those referred from other institutions because of suspicious sonographic results (Group 3); and those at risk because of a previous sibling with a NTD (Group 4). Ultrasonography was 100 per cent sensitive and 100 per cent specific in diagnosing NTDs. Thus, in pregnancies with an elevated AF-AFP concentration, ultrasonography can reliably identify normal fetuses as well as differentiate between those with NTDs and those with other congenital anomalies. Also, since AF-AFP concentrations decline after 20 weeks' gestation, ultrasonography may be a better test than a repeat amniocentesis in equivocal cases of AF-AFP elevation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.