JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woo, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K. M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 4, Issue 2 65-67, Copyright © 1985 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length

J. S. Woo, C. W. Wan and K. M. Cho

Ultrasonic fetal femur length (FL) measurement provides an accurate fetal length. Combined with cross-sectional dimensions such as the biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference (AC), FL provides a three-dimensional profile of the fetus. The usefulness of incorporating FL measurements into weight-predicting regression equations containing the BPD and AC was assessed. Multiple regression equations containing these three parameters as a function of log10 birthweight were constructed from data obtained from 125 patients within 48 hours of delivery. The mean errors in fetal weight prediction derived from five of these equations were assessed in another 92 patients. The coefficients of multiple correlation were marginally better in those equations that contained FL. The mean differences were also slightly lower with these equations compared with those that did not contain FL. However, the mean differences derived from all the equations were not significantly different from each other (P greater than 0.05). Therefore, despite theoretical considerations, the results from this study do not justify the routine clinical use of these new equations containing FL to estimate intrauterine fetal weight, in replacement of existing charts based on BPD and AC.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. Scioscia, A. Vimercati, O. Ceci, M. Vicino, and L. E. Selvaggi
Estimation of Birth Weight by Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography: A Critical Appraisal of Its Accuracy
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2008; 111(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C.-C. Lin and J. Santolaya-Forgas
CURRENT CONCEPTS OF FETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION: PART II. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 1999; 93(1): 140 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.