JUM AIUM Career Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avasthi, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eldridge, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avasthi, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eldridge, M. W.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 3, Issue 5 213-218, Copyright © 1984 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of echo-Doppler and electromagnetic renal blood flow measurements

P. S. Avasthi, E. R. Greene, W. F. Voyles and M. W. Eldridge

The linearity and accuracy of noninvasive ultrasonic method of measuring beat-to-beat renal blood flow was evaluated by correlation with standard electromagnetic flowmetry. Using a combined real-time ultrasonic imager and pulsed Doppler velocimeter known as a duplex scanner (DS), lumen diameter (D) and average blood velocity (V) within the imaged renal artery were recorded. Renal blood flow ( QDS ) was calculated offline using a microprocessor from the equation QDS = (pi x D2 x V)/4. This noninvasive method had previously been validated in vitro using a controlled hydraulic system which modeled steady-state flow (QT) where QDS = 0.98 QT + 7.75, SEE = +/- 13.2, r = +0.98, P less than 0.001. In three anesthetized dogs, simultaneous QDS and electromagnetic flow ( QEMF ) measurements (range 44-484 ml x min-1) were made in the proximal left renal artery. Linear regression analysis gave QDS = 0.43 QEMF + 40.5, r = 0.78, SEE = 33.8 ml x min-1, P less than 0.01; QDS = 1.2 QEMF + 2.9, r = 0.86, SEE = 20.8 ml x min-1, P less than 0.01; QDS = 0.86 QEMF + 0.2, r = 0.93, SEE = 53.4 ml x min-1, P less than 0.01. These results suggest that noninvasive QDS measurements of renal blood flow are linear and reasonably accurate compared with invasive QEMF in dogs. The method may have utility in the noninvasive measurement of beat-to-beat blood flow in human renal arteries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical As
Doppler Sonographic Imaging of the Vascular System: Report of the Ultrasonography Task Force
JAMA, May 8, 1991; 265(18): 2382 - 2387.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.