JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinkley, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, D. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brinkley, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, D. Y.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 3, Issue 4 163-168, Copyright © 1984 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Fetal weight estimation from lengths and volumes found by three-dimensional ultrasonic measurements

J. F. Brinkley, W. D. McCallum, S. K. Muramatsu and D. Y. Liu

A custom-built computer system combined with a commercial real-time ultrasonic scanner was used to predict fetal weight. A special three-dimensional (3D) locating system provided 3D coordinates of fetal surface points imaged on multiple ultrasound scans. The 3D coordinates were used to develop length and volume variables that are not available with commercial instruments. Multiple regressions were used to compare these lengths and volumes with more conventional diameters and circumferences for their ability to predict fetal weight. Measurements were made on 41 live fetuses within 48 hours prior to delivery (weight range 1,985-4,734 g, mean weight 3,421 g). Combinations of 19 measured variables were analyzed against birth weight and the natural log of birth weight. The correlation between log birth weight and combinations including lengths from 3D measurements was R = .93, SE = 73 g/kg. When volumes from 3D measurements (which are much more difficult to obtain) were added, the correlation was R = .94, SE = 69 g/kg. These results suggest that lengths from 3D measurements have the potential to improve fetal weight prediction by 25-30 per cent over current methods, which have an approximate error of 100 g/kg. The relative lack of improvement with volumes from 3D measurements is probably the result of technical problems which may be overcome with further research.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.