JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hines, N.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hines, N.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
© 2009 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 28:1629-1637 • 0278-4297

What Is the Clinical Importance of Echogenic Material in the Fetal Frontal Horns?

Neely Hines, MD, Tejas Mehta, MD, MPH, Janneth Romero, MD and Deborah Levine, MD

Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts USA.

Address correspondence to Deborah Levine, MD, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA. E-mail: dlevine{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the importance of echogenic material in the fetal frontal horns. Methods. This was a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant, Institutional Review Board–approved retrospective study. In part 1 of the study, prenatal sonography, prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and birth outcomes of 17 fetuses (mean gestational age, 19 weeks; range, 15–34 weeks) with prospective echogenic material in the frontal horns were assessed. In part 2, 400 consecutive sonographic fetal surveys (mean gestational age, 19 weeks; range, 15–38 weeks) were reviewed to determine the incidence. In part 3, 2 independent reviewers assessed the appearance of the frontal horns in 40 fetuses (20 with suspected intraventricular hemorrhage from parts 1 and 2 and 20 who were interpreted to have normal findings in part 2). Results. Part 1 of the study showed that suspected hemorrhage was unilateral in 13 fetuses and bilateral in 4. Additional findings by sonography were grade 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (n = 2), ventriculomegaly (n = 2), and porencephaly (n = 1). An additional finding by MRI was porencephaly in 1 fetus. In part 2, echogenic material in the frontal horns was identified in 3 of 400 fetuses (0.8%). In part 3, hemorrhage was probably or definitely present in 11 of the 20 fetuses with abnormalities; material looked like a cyst in 6; and normal choroid was in an abnormal position in 2 and a normal position 1. Of 19 fetuses with abnormalities, 14 had a posteriorly symmetric choroid; 9 had material of different echogenicity compared with the choroid; and 17 had an expanded frontal horn. Birth outcomes were abnormal in 7, including platelet abnormalities (n = 2), hemorrhage on imaging or pathologic examination (n = 2), extraventricular hemorrhage (n = 3), and ventriculomegaly (n = 3). Conclusions. The incidence of echogenic material in the frontal horns is less than 1%. This does not represent the normal location of the choroid plexus and may represent hemorrhage, which may resolve without sequelae or result in ventriculomegaly and porencephaly.

Key Words: central nervous system • fetal frontal horns • intraventricular hemorrhage

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid • LMP, last menstrual period • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.