JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saul, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wing, D. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saul, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wing, D. A.
© 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 27:1305-1311 • 0278-4297

Is Transabdominal Sonography of the Cervix After Voiding a Reliable Method of Cervical Length Assessment?

Lisa L. Saul, MD, James T. Kurtzman, MD, Cristiane Hagemann, MD, Mark Ghamsary, PhD and Deborah A. Wing, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California USA (L.L.S., J.T.K., C.H., D.A.W.); Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California USA (L.L.S.); Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Saddleback Memorial Medical Center, Laguna Hills, California USA (J.T.K.); and Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California USA (M.G.).

Address correspondence to Lisa L. Saul, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Dr, Orange, CA 92868 USA. E-mail: llspaylor{at}yahoo.com

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation and agreement between transvagi-nal and transabdominal cervical length measurement after bladder emptying as well as the feasibility of transabdominal sonography in cervical length screening. Methods. This was a prospective cohort study involving 287 participants (14–34 weeks’ gestation) from January to December 2003. After voiding, transabdominal and transvaginal cervical length measurements were obtained. The optimal trans-abdominal technique was established during an unblinded series of transabdominal and transvaginal cervical length measurements (n = 96). The same measurements were obtained in 191 participants under a blinded 2-sonographer protocol. The transabdominal cervical length cutoff to ensure 100% sensitivity in detecting a short cervix (≤2.5 cm) was determined. Results. There was no difference between mean transabdominal and transvaginal cervical lengths ± SD (3.57 ± 0.74 versus 3.61 ± 0.74 cm; P = .20). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.824. The 95% tolerance interval for any paired observation (transabdominal minus transvaginal) was –0.92 to 0.84 cm. All transvaginal cervical lengths of 2.5 cm or less were associated with paired transabdominal cervical lengths of 3 cm or less. Conclusions. With an optimal sonographic technique, postvoid transabdominal cervical measurement shows a close correlation and agreement with transvaginal assessment and is useful for cervical length screening.

Key Words: preterm delivery • shortened cervix • sonography • transabdominal sonography • transvaginal sonography

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.