This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Earn FREE CME Credit Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, M. J. Articles by Youk, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, M. J. Articles by Youk, J. H.

Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules With Macrocalcifications

Role of Suspicious Sonographic Findings

Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science (M.J.K., E.-K.K., J.Y.K.), and Department of Surgery (C.S.P., W.Y.C., K.-H.N.), Yonsei University Heath System, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Radiology, Bundang CHA General Hospital, Pochon CHA University, Seoul, Korea (J.H.Y.).

Address correspondence to Eun-Kyung Kim, MD, Department of Radiology, Yonsei University Heath System, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-ku, Seoul 120-752, Korea. E-mail: ekkim{at}yuhs.ac

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine which types of macrocalcifications are associated with thyroid carcinoma and to assess the role of other suspicious sonographic findings in thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications. Methods. Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was not required. We reviewed sonographic findings of thyroid nodules in 722 patients that underwent thyroid surgery in our institution between March 2006 and August 2006. Sonographic results were grouped into 3 types of macrocalcifications. Each lesion was evaluated on the basis of other suspicious sonographic criteria, including marked hypoechogenicity, irregular or microlobulated margins, and a taller-than-wide shape. Sensitivity and specificity based on sonographic criteria were calculated and compared among the subtypes of macrocalcifications. Results. One hundred seventy-four nodules showed macrocalcifications; 116 were malignant, and 58 were benign. Among the macrocalcification categories, solitary calcifications were more common in benign thyroid lesions, whereas coarse calcifications not otherwise specified were more common in malignant lesions (P < .05). Although the risk of malignancy was 17.2% in cases with no suspicious sonographic findings, the risk of malignancy was up to 82.8% in cases with at least 1 of the sonographic criteria (P < .05). On the basis of the suspicious sonographic criteria, the overall sensitivity was 82.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity among the macrocalcification subtypes (P > .05). Conclusions. Suspicious sonographic features such as marked hypoechogenicity, irregular or microlobulated margins, and a taller-than-wide shape can play important roles in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules with macrocalcifications.

Key Words: calcifications • sonography • thyroid

Abbreviations: FNAB, fine-needle aspiration biopsy • NOS, not otherwise specified

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Lee and B. H. Rho Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma With an Eggshell Calcification: Report of 3 Cases J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2009; 28(6): 801 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Kim, M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, S. W. Hong, E. J. Son, and K. H. Kim Sonographic Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules With Eggshell Calcifications J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2008; 27(10): 1425 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]