JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayrak, I. K.
Right arrow Articles by Diren, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayrak, I. K.
Right arrow Articles by Diren, B.
© 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 27:1129-1136 • 0278-4297

Bifid Median Nerve in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Ilkay Koray Bayrak, MD, Ayse Oytun Bayrak, MD, Melike Kale, MD, Hande Turker, MD and Baris Diren, MD

Departments of Neurology (I.K.B., M.K., B.D.) and Radiology (A.O.B., H.T.), Ondokuz Mayis University, School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Address correspondence to Ilkay Koray Bayrak, MD, Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University Medical Faculty, Kurupelit, 55139 Samsun, Turkey. E-mail: ilkaykoray{at}hotmail.com

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of the anatomic variation of a bifid median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to determine the size criteria for sonography. Methods. On axial sonograms of 320 hands of 170 patients with CTS and 240 hands of 120 unaffected individuals, the median nerve was evaluated morphologically for a bifid median nerve, and the cross-sectional area was measured at 3 levels (radial-ulnar junction, pisiform, and hook of the hamate). Electrophysiologic studies were performed in addition to clinical and sonographic evaluations in all patients, controls with a bifid median nerve, and controls with a cross-sectional area of greater than 0.09 cm2. Results. A bifid median nerve was seen in 32 (19%) of 170 patients and 11 (9%) of 120 controls. It occurred relatively frequently in patients with CTS (P < .01). The cross-sectional area of the bifid median nerve was relatively higher than that of the nonbifid median nerve in controls at 2 of the 3 levels (P < .001; P = .226; P < .01). The cutoff values for the cross-sectional area at the level of the pisiform were 0.11 cm2 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 99%; P < .001) for patients with a bifid median nerve and 0.10 cm2 (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 81%; P < .001) for patients with a nonbifid median nerve. Conclusions. A bifid median nerve occurs relatively frequently in patients with CTS. It may facilitate compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel because of its relatively higher cross-sectional area compared with a nonbifid median nerve. The size criterion for CTS in patients with a bifid median nerve is slightly higher than in those with a nonbifid median nerve.

Key Words: bifid median nerve • carpal tunnel syndrome • electrophysiology • high division of median nerve • sonography

Abbreviations: CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome • ROC, receiver operating characteristic

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.