JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Earn FREE CME Credits
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Brien, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zachary, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Brien, W. D., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Zachary, J. F.
© 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 27:517-535 • 0278-4297


AIUM Bioeffects Consensus Report

The Risk of Exposure to Diagnostic Ultrasound in Postnatal Subjects

Thermal Effects

William D. O’Brien, Jr, PhD, Cheri X. Deng, PhD, Gerald R. Harris, PhD, Bruce A. Herman, MS, Christopher R. Merritt, MD, Naren Sanghvi, MS and James F. Zachary, DVM, PhD

Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (W.D.O.), and Department of Pathobiology (J.F.Z.), University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio USA (C.X.D.); US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland USA (G.R.H., B.A.H.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA (C.R.M.); Focus Surgery Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana USA (N.S.).

Address correspondence to William D. O’Brien, Jr, PhD, Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, 405 N Mathews, Urbana, IL 61801 USA. E-mail: wdo{at}uiuc.edu

Abstract

This review evaluates the thermal mechanism for ultrasound-induced biological effects in postnatal subjects. The focus is the evaluation of damage versus temperature increase. A view of ultrasound-induced temperature increase is presented, based on thermodynamic Arrhenius analyses. The hyperthermia and other literature revealed data that allowed for an estimate of a temperature increase threshold of tissue damage for very short exposure times. This evaluation yielded an exposure time extension of the 1997 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Conclusions Regarding Heat statement (American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Laurel, MD) to 0.1 second for nonfetal tissue, where, at this exposure time, the temperature increase threshold of tissue damage was estimated to be about 18°C. The output display standard was also evaluated for soft tissue and bone cases, and it was concluded that the current thermal indices could be improved to reduce the deviations and scatter of computed maximum temperature rises.

Key Words: Arrhenius analysis • nonfetal tissue • output display standard • temperature increase threshold • thermal mechanism

Abbreviations: AIUM, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine • ALARA, as low as reasonably achievable • FDA, Food and Drug Administration • HIFU, high-intensity focused ultrasoundISATA, spatial-average temporal-average intensity • ISPPA.3, derated spatial-peak pulse-average intensity • ISPTA.3, derated spatial-peak temporal-average intensity • MI, mechanical index • NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements • NEMA, National Electrical Manufacturers Association • ODS, output display standard • ROC, radius of curvature • TI, thermal index • TIB, thermal index for bone • TIC, thermal index for cranial bone • TIS, thermal index for soft tissue




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. R. Nelson, J. B. Fowlkes, J. S. Abramowicz, and C. C. Church
Ultrasound Biosafety Considerations for the Practicing Sonographer and Sonologist
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2009; 28(2): 139 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Consensus Report on Potential Bioeffects of Diagnostic Ultrasound: Executive Summary
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 503 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. C. Church, E. L. Carstensen, W. L. Nyborg, P. L. Carson, L. A. Frizzell, and M. R. Bailey
The Risk of Exposure to Diagnostic Ultrasound in Postnatal Subjects: Nonthermal Mechanisms
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 565 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. E. Stratmeyer, J. F. Greenleaf, D. Dalecki, and K. A. Salvesen
Fetal Ultrasound: Mechanical Effects
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 597 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. L. Miller, M. A. Averkiou, A. A. Brayman, E. C. Everbach, C. K. Holland, J. H. Wible Jr, and J. Wu
Bioeffects Considerations for Diagnostic Ultrasound Contrast Agents
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 611 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.