JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Adler, R. S.
© 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 27:1735-1743 • 0278-4297

Utility of Portable Ultrasound in a Community in Ghana

Jacqueline K. Spencer, MD, MPH and Ronald S. Adler, PhD, MD

Department of Primary and Ambulatory Care, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts USA (J.K.S.); and Department of Radiology and Imaging, Division of Ultrasound and Body Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York USA (R.S.A.).

Address correspondence to Ronald S. Adler PhD, MD, Department of Radiology and Imaging, Division of Ultrasound and Body Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA. E-mail: adlerr{at}hss.edu

Objective. In many developing countries, access to medical imaging is limited by availability of resources. Portable ultrasound shows great promise to meet the needs in these countries because it is transportable and relatively inexpensive, and it has a wide range of applications. As part of the Ghana Health Mission, Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana, we explored the utility of ultrasound in primary care and hospital settings during March 2004. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical utility of a portable ultrasound machine in a variety of physical conditions and multiple clinical scenarios. Methods. Ultrasound examinations were performed at 2 primary care sites and 2 hospitals using a portable ultrasound machine with linear and curved linear phased array transducers. Most ultrasound examinations were musculoskeletal, with the remainder being obstetric, pelvic, breast, vascular, abdominal, and genitourinary examinations. Results. In clinic settings, musculoskeletal ultrasound represented 46% (16) of the ultrasound examinations performed, and 29% (10) of the cases were a combination of abdominal, pelvic, and genitourinary examinations. In hospital settings, abdominal, pelvic, and genitourinary ultrasound examinations combined were 56% (18), and musculoskeletal was 41% (13). Of the 67 ultrasound examinations performed, 81% (54) showed abnormal findings, 81% (54) were considered to add to the clinical diagnosis, and 40% (27) influenced medical care for the patients. Conclusions. This experience shows the usefulness of portable ultrasound examinations performed by a skilled radiologist in a clinical setting in Ghana; the challenge is to address how to best incorporate ultrasound into the current practice of medical professionals in developing countries.

Key Words: developing countries • Ghana • portable ultrasound

Abbreviations: GHM, Ghana Health Mission







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.