JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ko, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ko, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, L. S.
© 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 27:65-73 • 0278-4297

Factors Affecting the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Percutaneous Excision for Removal of Benign Breast Lesions

Eun Young Ko, MD, Young-A Bae, MD, Min-Jeong Kim, MD, Kwan Seop Lee, MD, Yul Lee, MD and Lee Su Kim, MD

Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.Y.K.); and Departments of Radiology (Y.-A.B., M.-J.K., K.S.L., Y.L.) and Surgery (L.S.K.), Hallym University Hospital, Anyang, Korea.

Address correspondence to Eun Young Ko, MD, Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea. E-mail: claudel{at}skku.edu

Objective. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of complete removal and factors affecting the presence of a residual mass and complications after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous removal of benign breast lesions. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated ultrasound images and medical records of 263 breast masses from 199 patients that were removed with an ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted device. All lesions were assumed as benign on ultrasound imaging or had been confirmed as benign by a previous core needle biopsy. The influence of the size, distance from the nipple, number of lesions removed at a time, and pathologic diagnosis of all of the removed masses on the completeness of the removal and the presence of complications was analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used in the statistical analysis. Results. The complete removal rate for ultrasound imaging immediately after the procedure was 95.8%, and the rate at more than 6 months for follow-up ultrasound imaging was 92.3%. Larger lesions, lesions closer to the nipple, and cases in which multiple lesions were removed at a time showed the presence of more residual lesions. Lesions closer to the nipple and cases in which multiple lesions were removed simultaneously developed more hematomas (P < .05). Conclusions. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous excision showed high effectiveness for the removal of benign breast masses. However, more attention should be given to certain lesions to increase the efficacy.

Key Words: benign breast lesion • mammotome • ultrasound

Abbreviations: BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System • DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ • IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.