JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Earn FREE CME Credit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Asch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:993-1002 • 0278-4297

Variations in Appearance of Endometriomas

Elizabeth Asch, AB and Deborah Levine, MD

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts USA (E.A.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts USA (D.L.).

Address correspondence to Deborah Levine, MD, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA. E-mail: dlevine{at}bidmc.harvard.edu

Objective. Because of the range of patient ages with endometriosis, the persistence of endometriomas, and the degradation of internal blood products over time, the appearance of endometriomas is variable. The purpose of this study was to identify the prospective diagnoses in cases of surgically proven endometriomas and to illustrate the variety of appearances of endometriomas. Methods. Sonographic images from 325 women with histologic confirmation of an adnexal mass during a 16-month period were reviewed. Eighty-seven endometriomas in 71 women were found. Prospective diagnoses were scored as follows: 1, the diagnosis was endometrioma only; 2, the differential diagnosis listed endometrioma first; 3, the differential diagnosis listed endometrioma but not first; 4, the diagnosis did not include endometrioma but included a complex or hemorrhagic cyst; and 5, the diagnosis did not include endometrioma. Lesions with the classic appearance of an endometrioma (hypoechoic mass with diffuse low-level internal echoes) or an atypical appearance were chosen for illustration. Results. Thirty-five (60.3%) of 58 endometriomas measuring at least 2 cm in greatest dimension included endometrioma in the differential diagnosis at sonography. In 6 (10.3%) of 58, the lesions were described as complex or hemorrhagic cysts. Atypical endometriomas included cases with retracted clots that appeared solid but without blood flow, endometriomas in pregnant patients, and endometriomas in postmenopausal women with heterogeneous internal echoes and central calcification. A ruptured endometrioma was interpreted as pelvic inflammatory disease. Five endometriomas were suspected to be malignancies because of a solid appearance, blood flow, surrounding adhesions, and, in 1 pregnant patient, extensive decidualization. Conclusions. Recognition of the varied appearance of endometriomas should aid the interpreting physician in giving an appropriate prospective diagnosis of endometriomas.

Key Words: adnexa • endometrioma • endometriosis • ovary • sonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Barbieri, E. Somigliana, S. Oneda, M. W. Ossola, B. Acaia, and L. Fedele
Decidualized ovarian endometriosis in pregnancy: a challenging diagnostic entity
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1818 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ghattamaneni, M J Weston, and J A Spencer
Imaging in endometriosis
Imaging, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 345 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.