JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, M.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yan, K.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:1055-1063 • 0278-4297


Technical Advance

The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Selection of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Radio Frequency Ablation Therapy

Min-Hua Chen, MD, Wei Wu, PhD, Wei Yang, MD, Ying Dai, MD, Wen Gao, MS, Shan-Shan Yin, MD and Kun Yan, MS

Department of Ultrasound, School of Oncology, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Address correspondence to Min-Hua Chen, MD, Department of Ultrasound, School of Oncology, Peking University, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Rd, Haidian District, 100036 Beijing, China. E-mail: minhuachen{at}bjcancer.org, minhuachen{at}vip.sina.com

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for radio frequency ablation (RFA). Methods. One hundred seventy-nine patients with HCC were divided into 2 groups before receiving RFA: a CEUS group and a control group. The patients were concatenated and alternately apportioned into these 2 groups. In the CEUS group, 92 patients underwent pre-RFA CEUS using the contrast agent sulfur hexafluoride and enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging before RFA for selecting suitable cases for RFA, and in the control group, conventional ultrasonography and enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 87 patients for selecting patients. Results. In the CEUS group, 9 patients (9.8%) were excluded for RFA therapy by CEUS. The other 83 patients (90.2%), with a total of 114 lesions, were treated by RFA. In the control group, 5 patients (5.7%) were excluded for RFA. The other 82 patients (94.3%), with a total of 107 lesions, were treated by RFA. During the follow-up period of 18 to 50 months, the primary technique effectiveness rates in the CEUS and control groups were 94.7% and 87.9%, respectively (P = .1182). The local tumor progression rate, the new HCC rate, and the repeated RFA rate of the CEUS group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P = .033, .004, and .001, respectively). Conclusions. Pre-RFA CEUS provides important information for selecting suitable patients for RFA. The use of CEUS in selecting patients with HCC can decrease post-RFA local tumor progression and improve the efficacy of RFA therapy.

Key Words: contrast-enhanced ultrasonography • hepatocellular carcinoma • indications • radio frequency ablation therapy

Abbreviations: CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography • CT, computed tomography • HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma • MRI, magnetic resonance imaging • RFA, radio frequency ablation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.