This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhi, H. Articles by Yang, H.-Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhi, H. Articles by Yang, H.-Y.

Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography, Mammography, and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Solid Breast Lesions

Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou China.

Address correspondence to Bao-Ming Luo, MD, Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 107 Yanjiangxi Rd, 510120 Guangzhou, China. E-mail: baomingluo2005{at}126.com

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of ultrasound elastography (UE) in differentiating benign versus malignant lesions in the breast and compare it with conventional sonography and mammography. Methods. From September 2004 to May 2005, 296 solid lesions from 232 consecutive patients were diagnosed as benign or malignant by mammography and sonography and further analyzed with UE. The diagnostic results were compared with histopathologic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and false-positive and -negative rates were calculated for each modality and the combination of UE and sonography. Results. Of 296 lesions, 87 were histologically malignant, and 209 were benign. Ultrasound elastography was the most specific (95.7%) and had the lowest false-positive rate (4.3%) of the 3 modalities. The accuracy (88.2%) and positive predictive value (87.1%) of UE were higher than those of sonography (72.6% and 52.5%, respectively). The sensitivity values, negative predictive values, and false negative rates of the 3 modalities had no differences. A combination of UE and sonography had the best sensitivity (89.7%) and accuracy (93.9%) and the lowest false-negative rate (9.2%). The specificity (95.7%) and positive predictive value (89.7%) of the combination were better, and the false-positive rate (4.3%) of the combination was lower than those of mammography and sonography. Conclusions. In a clinical trial with Chinese women, UE was superior to sonography and equal or superior to mammography in differentiating benign and malignant lesions in the breast. A combination of UE and sonography had the best results in detecting cancer and potentially could reduce unnecessary biopsy. Ultrasound elastography is a promising technique for evaluating breast lesions.

Key Words: breast carcinoma • mammography • sonography • ultrasound elastography

Abbreviations: ROI, region of interest • UE, ultrasound elastography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. V. Frangioni New Technologies for Human Cancer Imaging J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2008; 26(24): 4012 - 4021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Kolokythas, T. Gauthier, A. T. Fernandez, H. Xie, B. A. Timm, C. Cuevas, M. K. Dighe, L. M. Mitsumori, M. F. Bruce, D. A. Herzka, et al. Ultrasound-Based Elastography: A Novel Approach to Assess Radio Frequency Ablation of Liver Masses Performed With Expandable Ablation Probes: A Feasibility Study J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2008; 27(6): 935 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]