JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Carson, P. L.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:645-655 • 0278-4297


Technical Advance

Automated Ultrasound Scanning on a Dual-Modality Breast Imaging System

Coverage and Motion Issues and Solutions

Sumedha P. Sinha, MS, Mitchell M. Goodsitt, PhD, Marilyn A. Roubidoux, MD, Rebecca C. Booi, MS, Gerald L. LeCarpentier, PhD, Christine R. Lashbrook, RT(R)(M), Kai E. Thomenius, PhD, Carl L. Chalek, PhD and Paul L. Carson, PhD

Departments of Radiology (S.P.S., M.M.G., M.A.R., R.C.B., G.L.L., C.R.L., P.L.C.) and Biomedical Engineering (S.P.S., R.C.B., P.L.C.) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan USA; and GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York USA (K.E.T., C.L.C.).

Address correspondence to Sumedha P. Sinha, MS, Department of Radiology, Basic Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan, 200 Zina Pitcher Pl, Room 3315, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0553 USA. E-mail: sumedha{at}umich.edu

Objective. We are developing an automated ultrasound imaging-mammography system wherein a digital mammography unit has been augmented with a motorized ultrasound transducer carriage above a special compression paddle. Challenges of this system are acquiring complete coverage of the breast and minimizing motion. We assessed these problems and investigated methods to increase coverage and stabilize the compressed breast. Methods. Visual tracings of the breast-to-paddle contact area and breast periphery were made for 10 patients to estimate coverage area. Various motion artifacts were evaluated in 6 patients. Nine materials were tested for coupling the paddle to the breast. Fourteen substances were tested for coupling the transducer to the paddle in lateral-to-medial and medial-to-lateral views and filling the gap between the peripheral breast and paddle. In-house image registration software was used to register adjacent ultrasound sweeps. Results. The average breast contact area was 56%. The average percentage of the peripheral air gap filled with ultrasound gel was 61%. Shallow patient breathing proved equivalent to breath holding, whereas speech and sudden breathing caused unacceptable artifacts. An adhesive spray that preserves image quality was found to be best for coupling the breast to the paddle and minimizing motion. A highly viscous ultrasound gel proved most effective for coupling the transducer to the paddle for lateral-to-medial and medial-to-lateral views and for edge fill-in. Conclusions. The challenges of automated ultrasound scanning in a multimodality breast imaging system have been addressed by developing methods to fill in peripheral gaps, minimize patient motion, and register and reconstruct multisweep ultrasound image volumes.

Key Words: acoustic coupling • automated breast ultrasound scanning • breast cancer screening • complete coverage • motion artifacts

Abbreviations: CC, craniocaudal • CIRS, Computerized Imaging Reference Systems • CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio • IQ, in phase/quadrature phase • LM, lateral-to-medial • ML, medial-to-lateral • RMS, root mean square • ROI, region of interest • 3D, 3-dimensional • TPX, 4-methylpentene-1-based polyolefin







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.