JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Needleman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Needleman, L.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:487-499 • 0278-4297

Review Article

Current Status of Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques

See-Ying Chiou, MD, Ji-Bin Liu, MD and Laurence Needleman, MD

Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (S.-Y.C.); School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (S.-Y.C.); and Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA (J.-B.L., L.N.).

Address correspondence to Ji-Bin Liu, MD, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 132 S 10th St, Suite 796A, Main Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA. E-mail: Ji-Bin.Liu{at}jefferson.edu

Objective. The purpose of this article was to review the current clinical applications of sonographically guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques. Methods. Publications regarding RFA extracted from a computerized database (MEDLINE) and from references cited in these articles were reviewed to evaluate the clinical effect and patient outcome. Results. Radiofrequency ablation has shown some promising effects in the treatment of tumors in various parts of the body. The recent advances in RFA technology enable larger volumes of treatment and make RFA clinically practical. It is most often used for hepatic and renal tumors, and applications for other organs and structures are increasing and rapidly developing. Sonography provides a convenient way to guide and monitor the procedure in most situations. Conclusions. Effectiveness of RFA in the treatment of tumors in various body parts has been achieved. Radiofrequency ablation should be considered as an alternative or complementary method in the integration of oncologic management to obtain the greatest benefit to patients.

Key Words: neoplasm • radiofrequency ablation • sonography • thermal effect

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography • HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma • MR, magnetic resonance • PEIT, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy • RCC, renal cell carcinoma • RF, radiofrequency • RFA, radiofrequency ablation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. D. Mast, D. P. Pucke, S. E. Subramanian, W. J. Bowlus, S. M. Rudich, and J. F. Buell
Ultrasound Monitoring of In Vitro Radio Frequency Ablation by Echo Decorrelation Imaging
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2008; 27(12): 1685 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.