This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nyhsen, C. M. Articles by Elliott, S. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nyhsen, C. M. Articles by Elliott, S. T.

Rapid Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography

Department of Radiology, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.

Address correspondence to Simon T. Elliott, MB, ChB, FRCR, Department of Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, England.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess the application and accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) volume acquisition ultrasonography in the measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing surveillance ultrasonographic examinations of known AAAs were scanned according to a conventional protocol, after which 3D volume data sets were acquired with a commercially available mechanical transducer. Maximum aortic diameters were measured with multiplanar reconstructions from the 3D volume data, and these were compared with those from the conventional technique. Results. Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters were between 2.9 and 6.75 cm. For both anteroposterior and transverse diameters, a paired t test showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.98 (significant at the P = .01 level) and a coefficient of determination of 0.96. Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between the two sets of measurements was very close to 0 (P = .05). Thus, there was no significant difference between the conventional and 3D volume measurement methods. The scan acquisition time for the 3D volume data was only 3 seconds for each set (anteroposterior and transverse). Conclusions. Three-dimensional ultrasonography using volume acquisition offers a new opportunity to acquire fast and reliable AAA measurements. The reduced scan times can be used to allow greater patient throughput and will help cope with the increasing workload of AAA surveillance. By archiving a complete set of data, 3D ultrasonography allows subsequent analysis and comparison of measurements. This study also suggests that the technique could be used for other applications with similar efficiency gains.

Key Words: abdominal aortic aneurysm • 3-dimensional ultrasonography • volume ultrasonography

Abbreviations: AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm • AP, anteroposterior • 3D, 3-dimensional • 3DUS, 3-dimensional volume acquisition ultrasonography • TS, transverse

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. John, D. Rowland, U. Patel, J. Pilcher, K. Anson, and D. Nassiri Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography of the Kidney Using an In Vitro Renal Model J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2009; 28(2): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S T Elliott Volume ultrasound: the next big thing? Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 8 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF]