JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Artas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Orhan, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Artas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Orhan, I.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:1775-1779 • 0278-4297

Scrotal Calculi

Hakan Artas, MD and Irfan Orhan, MD

Department of Radiology, Elazig Training and Research Hospital, Elazig, Turkey (H.A.); and Department of Urology, Firat University, Faculty of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey (I.O.).

Address correspondence to Hakan Artas, MD, Elazig Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Radyoloji Bölümü, 23100 Elazig, Turkey. E-mail: hakanartas{at}yahoo.com

Objective. Scrotal calculi are freely mobile calcified bodies lying between the layers of the tunica vaginalis of the testes. The etiology of scrotal calculi is unclear. They may develop as a sequela to hematomas or inflammatory changes within the scrotum or loose bodies from torsion and infarction of the appendix testis or epididymis. The aim of our series was to examine the etiopathogenesis of scrotal calculi, which were detected incidentally in various age groups, with reference to the medical literature. Methods. Among 868 patients, 23 (2.65%) cases of scrotal calculi were diagnosed on sonographic examinations. The ages of the patients ranged between 4 months and 65 years (mean age ± SD, 28.3 ± 11.9 years). Results. On sonographic examination; we found a total of 51 scrotal calculi with a mean size of 4.22 ± 2.42 mm (range, 2–10 mm) in 23 patients, an epididymal cyst in 3 patients (13%), epididymitis in 2 patients (8.6%), hydrocele in 3 patients (13%), varicocele in 3 patients (13%), and testicular microlithiasis in 1 patient (4%). Scrotal calculi were solitary in 11 patients and multiple in 12 patients. Conclusions. The prevalence of scrotal calculi was 2.65%, and a minority of patients had other abnormalities, reflecting the generally benign etiology of these "pearls." To date, no information is available in the literature about the results of chronic irritation due to scrotal calculi. Further studies in larger series need to be performed to elucidate the formation mechanism and natural course of scrotal calculi.

Key Words: calculi • scrotum • sonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
I Amaechi and P S Sidhu
Ultrasound in the assessment of the "on-call" acute scrotum
Imaging, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.