JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, E. B.
© 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 26:1523-1528 • 0278-4297

Sonographic Fetal Asymmetry Predicts Shoulder Dystocia

Russell S. Miller, MD, Patricia C. Devine, MD and E. Blair Johnson, MD

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York USA.

Address correspondence to Russell S. Miller, MD, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, PH 16-66, New York, NY 10032 USA. E-mail: rsm20{at}columbia.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a sonographic measurement of fetal asymmetry, abdominal diameter minus biparietal diameter (AD – BPD), in the prediction of shoulder dystocia (SD) in a patient population that was unselected for diabetes mellitus (DM) status. Methods. Patients who underwent sonographic estimations of fetal biometric measurements within 14 days of vaginally delivered live-born singleton neonates weighing 3400 g or greater at a tertiary care institution were included in this retrospective cohort. The mean AD – BPD was retrospectively compared in deliveries complicated by SD with those without SD by the Student t test. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine the optimal cutoff for SD prediction. Test performance characteristics of AD – BPD were determined. Results. Of 5204 deliveries, 332 met inclusion criteria. Shoulder dystocia complicated 23 deliveries (6.9%). The mean AD – BPD was significantly higher in the dystocia group (2.39 versus 1.97; P = .0002). With an AD – BPD of 2.6 cm or greater, the risk rates of SD were 25% for unselected patients and 38.5% with DM. Conclusions. An AD – BPD of 2.6 cm or greater identifies a subset of patients with and without DM at risk for SD.

Key Words: fetal biometry • shoulder dystocia • sonography

Abbreviations: AC, abdominal circumference • ACOG, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists • AD, abdominal diameter • BPD, biparietal diameter • CI, confidence interval • DM, diabetes mellitus • EFW, estimated fetal weight • LR, likelihood ratio • NPV, negative predictive value • OR, odds ratio • PPV, positive predictive value • SD, shoulder dystocia




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
R. D. Jelsema and R. S. Miller
Sonographic Fetal Asymmetry Predicts Shoulder Dystocia * Reply
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 682 - 683.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.