JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oktar, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oktar, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Özdemir, H.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:1051-1058 • 0278-4297


Image Presentation

Portomesenteric Venous Gas

Imaging Findings With an Emphasis on Sonography

Suna Özhan Oktar, MD, Devrim Karaosmanoglu, MD, Cem Yücel, MD, Gonca Erbas, MD, Aydan Ilkme, MD, Ilksen Canpolat, MD and Hakan Özdemir, MD

Department of Radiology, Gazi University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Address correspondence to Suna Özhan Oktar, MD, Radyoloji Anabilim Dali, Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, 06510 Besevler, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: sunaoktar{at}gazi.edu.tr

Objective. Portomesenteric venous gas is a rare condition with an unclear pathogenesis. Most studies in the medical literature mention computed tomography (CT) as the primary imaging tool for this entity. The objective of this study was to outline the advantages and disadvantages of sonography in the evaluation of patients with portomesenteric venous gas. Methods. We describe 7 patients (3 female and 4 male; age range, 47–83 years) with portomesenteric venous gas. Both CT and sonographic examinations were performed in each patient. Our patient population consisted of 2 patients with superior mesenteric artery occlusion, 3 with ischemia of the colon, small bowel, or both, 1 with gastric ulcer perforation, and 1 with ischemic bowel disease presumably secondary to complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Results. Portal venous gas was observed in all 7 patients with sonography and in 6 patients with CT. Computed tomography was unable to show gas in the portal venous system in 1 patient. Sonography showed patchy hepatic gas accumulation (likely within small peripheral portal vein branches) with no correlative findings on CT. Computed tomography showed important associated findings, including pneumatosis intestinalis. Conclusions. In cases with portomesenteric gas, CT is the preferred modality for showing the underlying etiology. However, with its real-time imaging capability, sonography may also be a very valuable imaging modality in the evaluation of this entity.

Key Words: computed tomography • portal vein gas • portomesenteric gas • sonography

Abbreviations: CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis • CT, computed tomography • SMA, superior mesenteric artery • SMV, superior mesenteric vein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
I-T. Lin, W.-H. Chang, S.-C. Shih, W.-H. Chang, and M.-J. Bair
Bedside echogram in ischaemic bowel
Emerg. Med. J., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 304 - 304.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.