JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T.
Right arrow Articles by VanMiddlesworth, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T.
Right arrow Articles by VanMiddlesworth, L.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:1021-1029 • 0278-4297

Initial Clinical Experience Imaging Scatterer Size and Strain in Thyroid Nodules

Thaddeus Wilson, PhD, Quan Chen, PhD, James A. Zagzebski, PhD, Tomy Varghese, PhD and Lester VanMiddlesworth, MD, PhD

Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee USA (T.W., L.V.); and Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin USA (Q.C., J.A.Z., T.V.).

Address correspondence to Thaddeus Wilson, PhD, Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee, 865 Jefferson Ave, Memphis, TN 38163 USA. E-mail: tawilson{at}utmem.edu

Objective. This article describes a new research ultrasound scanner that can be programmed to produce elastograms and backscatter parametric images in real time. Its performance was evaluated in a clinical setting. Methods. Radio frequency data were acquired from 13 patients with thyroid nodules and from 4 normal thyroids, along with reference phantom data. Scatterer size was deduced by measuring the backscatter versus frequency and fitting data to a model. Strain was obtained by a cross-correlation method, comparing precompression and postcompression radio frequency signals. Scatterer size contrast was defined as the observed contrast between the "normal" and "abnormal" tissue in the same gland or, when considering diffuse conditions, by comparing with normal values. Strain contrast was estimated if abnormal and normal tissue was captured in the same palpation, that is, excluding diffuse disease, which was the case for 9 subjects. Results. On scatterer size images, 4 nodules exhibited positive contrast versus the adjacent normal parenchyma, indicating larger scatterers. Five nodules were isoechoic, and 4 had negative contrast. Four nodules exhibited positive strain contrast, indicating that they were softer than the normal parenchyma. Two nodules had the same brightness, and 3 were darker than the background thyroid tissue on strain images. Conclusions. Contrast was observed between nodules and thyroid parenchymal tissue for both types of parametric images. Further work is needed to determine whether the diagnostic importance of these parameters in characterizing thyroid nodules might be worthwhile. Both modes must be of a sufficient frame rate to provide real-time feedback to operators, which will require further work.

Key Words: acoustic backscatter coefficient • elastography • frequency-dependent backscatter • quantitative imaging • sonographic tissue characterization • thyroid

Abbreviations: FNA, fine-needle aspiration • RF, radio frequency • TSH, thyrotropin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. Shao, J. Bai, L. Cui, J. Wang, Y. Fu, K. Liu, and S. Feng
Elastographic Evaluation of the Temporal Formation of Ethanol-Induced Hepatic Lesions: Preliminary In Vitro Results
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2007; 26(9): 1191 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
U. Bae, M. Dighe, T. Dubinsky, S. Minoshima, V. Shamdasani, and Y. Kim
Ultrasound Thyroid Elastography Using Carotid Artery Pulsation: Preliminary Study
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 797 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.