JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hidaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hidaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Chiba, Y.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:765-769 • 0278-4297


Case Series

Megacystis-Microcolon-Intestinal Hypoperistalsis Syndrome

In Utero Sonographic Appearance and the Contribution of Vesicocentesis in Antenatal Diagnosis

Nobuhiro Hidaka, MD, Kazuya Kawamata, MD and Yoshihide Chiba, MD, PhD

Department of Perinatology, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.

Address correspondence to Nobuhiro Hidaka, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashiku 812-8582, Fukuoka, Japan. E-mail: n-hidaka{at}kpa.biglobe.ne.jp

Objective. The purpose of this report is to describe the in utero sonographic appearance of megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) and examine the role of vesicocentesis. Methods. Two cases of the sonographic appearance of MMIHS were reviewed. We performed vesicocentesis in 2 fetuses with MMIHS and performed vesicoamniotic shunting in 1 of them. The sonographic findings after these procedures were compared with those before puncture. Results. In both cases, ultrasound examination showed a massively enlarged fetal bladder and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis with a normal amount of amniotic fluid. Fetal urinary sodium and chloride concentrations were within normal limits in both cases; this suggested normal fetal renal function. Generally, it is difficult to detect the dilated fetal bowel in MMIHS, probably because of the disturbance caused by a large bladder. In our cases, however, the ultrasound examination clearly showed fetal bowel dilatation after these procedures; this made the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS more definite. Conclusions. The sonographic features after vesicocentesis may be helpful in confirming the antenatal diagnosis of MMIHS.

Key Words: fetal urinalysis • megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome • sonographic appearance • vesicocentesis

Abbreviations: MMIHS, megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistal-sis syndrome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. Bornstein, K. Atkins, S. Fishman, A. Monteagudo, E. B. Bajor-Dattilo, F. Arif, S. Monda, A. M. Greco, and I. E. Timor-Tritsch
Severe Uropathy and Normal Amniotic Fluid Volume in a Male Fetus: Sonographic Surveillance Leading to the Diagnosis of Megacystis-Microcolon-Intestinal Hypoperistalsis Syndrome
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2008; 27(7): 1099 - 1104.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.