JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costantini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bonomo, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costantini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bonomo, L.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:649-659 • 0278-4297


Case Series

Characterization of Solid Breast Masses

Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon

Melania Costantini, MD, Paolo Belli, MD, Roberta Lombardi, MD, Gianluca Franceschini, MD, Antonino Mulè, MD and Lorenzo Bonomo, MD

Departments of Bio-Imaging and Radiological Sciences (M.C., P.B., R.L., L.B.), Surgery (G.F.), and Pathology (A.M.), Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

Address correspondence to Melania Costantini, MD, Department of Bio-Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Catholic University, Largo F. Vito 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. E-mail: mcostantini{at}rm.unicatt.it

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Methods. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Results. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. Conclusions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.

Key Words: breast masses • diagnosis • sonography

Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Radiology • BI-RADS, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System • FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytologic examination • NPV, negative predictive value • PPV, positive predictive value




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S.-E. Baek, M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. H. Youk, H.-J. Lee, and E. J. Son
Effect of Clinical Information on Diagnostic Performance in Breast Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2009; 28(10): 1349 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E.-K. Kim, K. H. Ko, K. K. Oh, J. Y. Kwak, J. K. You, M. J. Kim, and B.-W. Park
Clinical Application of the BI-RADS Final Assessment to Breast Sonography in Conjunction with Mammography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1209 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
T. G. ODLE
Breast Ultrasound
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2007; 78(3): 222M - 242M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.