JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valsky, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Yagel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valsky, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Yagel, S.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:613-616 • 0278-4297


Technical Advance

The Shadow of the Intrauterine Device

Dan Vadim Valsky, MD, Sarah M. Cohen, BA, Drorith Hochner-Celnikier, MD, Achinoam Lev-Sagie, MD and Simcha Yagel, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital–Mount Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel.

Address correspondence to Simcha Yagel, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital–Mount Scopus, PO Box 24035, Jerusalem IL-91240, Israel. E-mail: syagel{at}hadassah.org.il

Objective. An intrauterine device (IUD) is a highly effective and prevalent form of birth control with a low failure rate. It is not without complications, including irregular bleeding and pelvic pain, perforation, expulsion, and pregnancy. Investigation of the symptomatic patient and routine follow-up of asymptomatic women with IUDs include transvaginal ultrasonography to rule out IUD malposition and other complications. Three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS) has been shown to have added value in imaging the pelvic organs, including the uterus. However, even with 3DUS, the operator may encounter difficulty in imaging the IUD in its entirety, because of variability in both echogenicity and exact location. Methods. More than 30 women undergoing IUD placement evaluation, including routine examinations and cases of suspected pregnancy, irregular bleeding, infection, and pelvic pain, were evaluated with 3DUS and volume contrast imaging in the C plane (VCI-C), which visualized acoustic shadows of the IUDs, facilitating identification of the intrauterine position and type of the device. Results. Four examples are presented from women undergoing evaluation of IUD placement in whom 2-dimensional ultrasonography failed to visualize the device satisfactorily. Volume contrast imaging in the C plane allowed visualization of the acoustic shadows of the IUDs, thereby providing more exact imaging of the type of device as well as aiding in locating the IUD. In a woman with irregular bleeding, a bicornuate uterus with pregnancy in 1 horn and a bowed T-type IUD in the contralateral horn were diagnosed with VCI-C. Conclusions. We conclude from these shadow images that VCI-C is a useful modality in cases of difficult visualization of the IUD; VCI-C visualization of the acoustic shadow of the IUD may provide an adjunctive approach.

Key Words: intrauterine device • 3-dimensional ultrasonography • volume contrast imaging C plane

Abbreviations: IUD, intrauterine device • 3DUS, 3-dimensional ultrasonography • VCI-C, volume contrast imaging in the C plane




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. Peri, D. Graham, and D. Levine
Imaging of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1389 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.