JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Coley, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Coley, B. D.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:259-263 • 0278-4297


Case Series

Fetus In Fetu and Fetaform Teratoma in 2 Neonates

An Embryologic Spectrum?

Kimberly R. Higgins, RDMS and Brian D. Coley, MD

Section of Ultrasound, Department of Radiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio USA.

Address correspondence to Brian D. Coley, MD, Department of Radiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Dr, Columbus, OH 43205 USA. E-mail: bcoley{at}chi.osu.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to describe the imaging and pathologic findings of 2 cases of complex neonatal abdominal masses and to discuss the probable common embryologic etiology of fetus in fetu (FIF) and fetaform teratomas. Methods. Two male neonates had complex cystic abdominal masses, 1 of which was diagnosed prenatally, and both had abdominal sonography. One patient also had abdominal computed tomography. Both patients subsequently underwent surgical resection, with pathologic and genetic analysis of these masses. Results. One patient had typical imaging, pathologic, and genetic findings of FIF. The second patient had a well-formed mass that was diagnosed pathologically as a teratoma yet had most of the criteria for FIF that have been set forth in recent embryologic literature. Conclusions. Recent concepts regarding the origin of FIF suggest that it is part of a spectrum of monozygotic twinning gone awry, ranging from conjoined twins at one end to fetaform teratomas at the other. The imaging and pathologic features of these 2 cases serve to reinforce this concept.

Key Words: embryology • fetus in fetu • pediatric • sonography • teratoma

Abbreviations: FIF, fetus in fetu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
R. E. Gerber, A. Kamaya, S. S. Miller, D. M. Cronin, B. Dwyer, J. Chueh, K. E. Conner, and R. A. Barth
Fetus In Fetu: 11 Fetoid Forms in a Single Fetus: Review of the Literature and Imaging
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2008; 27(9): 1381 - 1387.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.