JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yurdakul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cumhur, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yurdakul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cumhur, T.
© 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 25:211-215 • 0278-4297

B-flow Imaging for Assessment of 70% to 99% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Residual Lumen Diameter

Mehmet Yurdakul, MD, Muharrem Tola, MD and Turhan Cumhur, MD

Department of Radiology, Turkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Address correspondence to Mehmet Yurdakul, MD, Department of Radiology, Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Kizilay Sokak 4, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: myurdakul{at}tyih.gov.tr

Objective. The purpose of this study was to use B-flow imaging (BFI) to investigate whether the minimal residual lumen diameter (MRLD) measurement can be used in place of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method of measurement. Methods. One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were examined with BFI and digital subtraction angiography. The diagnostic performances of the NASCET method of measurement with the BFI and MRLD measurements in determining 70% to 99% ICA stenosis were compared by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results. There was no difference between the performances of the two methods in estimating 70% to 99% ICA stenosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.979 for the NASCET method and 0.978 for the MRLD measurement; P = .899). In the assessment of ICA stenosis, an MRLD measurement of 1.5 mm was determined as the optimal threshold value. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of this threshold were 93%, 94%, 84%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. Conclusions. In the BFI examination, when the distal ICA, which is the denominator in the NASCET method of measurement, cannot be measured at all or cannot be measured accurately, an MRLD measurement that is equal to or less than 1.5 mm is the criterion that can be used with confidence in determining 70% to 99% ICA stenosis.

Key Words: B-flow imaging • carotid arteries • digital subtraction angiography • obstruction • stenosis

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve • BFI, B-flow imaging • CDU, color duplex ultrasonography • DSA, digital subtraction angiography • ICA; internal carotid artery • MRLD, minimal residual lumen diameter • NASCET, North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial • NDL, normal distal lumen • ROC, receiver operating characteristic







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.