This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lockhart, M. E. Articles by Allon, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lockhart, M. E. Articles by Allon, M.

Cephalic Vein Measurement Before Forearm Fistula Creation

Does Use of a Tourniquet to Meet the Venous Diameter Threshold Increase the Number of Usable Fistulas?

Departments of Radiology (M.E.L., M.L.R.) and Biostatistics (N.S.F.), School of Medicine (C.G.W.), and Division of Nephrology (M.A.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama USA.

Address correspondence to Mark Lockhart, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th St S, JTN358, Birmingham, AL 35249-6830 USA. E-mail: mlockhart{at}uabmc.edu

Objective. To optimize forearm radiocephalic fistula success, many programs recommend a minimal cephalic vein diameter of 0.25 cm or greater on preoperative sonographic mapping. It is not established, however, whether a vein diameter before or after application of a tourniquet should be used in determining suitability for creation of a forearm fistula. Methods. Before forearm radiocephalic fistula placement, preoperative sonographic mapping measured the cephalic vein diameter before and after application of a tourniquet. The patients fell into 2 groups: those with a pretourniquet vein diameter of 0.25 cm or greater (group 1) and those with a pretourniquet vein diameter of less than 0.25 cm that increased to 0.25 cm or greater after application of the tourniquet (group 2). The adequacy of each fistula for dialysis was determined clinically. Results. Among 73 radiocephalic fistulas with known clinical outcomes, 28 were in group 1, and 45 were in group 2, on the basis of sonography. Fistula success rates were similar in group 1 patients (11 [39%] of 28) and group 2 patients (15 [33%] of 45) (P = .624, Fisher exact test). Inclusion of group 2 patients increased the number of patients recommended for placement of forearm fistulas and increased the total number of usable forearm fistulas from 11 to 26. The overall success rate of forearm fistulas was lower in women (19% versus 50%; P = .015, Fisher exact test). Conclusions. The use of a venous tourniquet increases the number of patients eligible for forearm fistulas without decreasing the adequacy rate of these fistulas. Therefore, a tourniquet should routinely be used in patients with small cephalic veins on pretourniquet evaluation.

Key Words: dialysis shunts • Doppler sonography • fistula • hemodialysis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Ferring, J. Henderson, A. Wilmink, and S. Smith Vascular ultrasound for the pre-operative evaluation prior to arteriovenous fistula formation for haemodialysis: review of the evidence Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1809 - 1815. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Viduetsky Unexpected Doppler Waveform Patterns in the Lower Extremity Arteries Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 2007; 23(5): 293 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]