JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Tamir, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Tamir, A.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:1229-1233 • 0278-4297

Nomogram of Maxillary Bone Length in Normal Pregnancies

Israel Goldstein, MD, Ari Reiss, MD, Bat-Sheva Rajamim, RN and Ada Tamir, PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel (I.G., A.R., B.-S.R.); and Department of Epidemiology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel (A.T.).

Address correspondence to Israel Goldstein, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, PO Box 9602, Haifa 31096, Israel. E-mail: i_goldstein{at}rambam.health.gov.il

Objective. The aim of this study was to define normal ultrasonographic growth of the fetal maxillary bone throughout pregnancy as a basis for further studies and as normative data for assessing deviations in growth. Methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. Consecutive routine biometric measurements and fetal organ scans were obtained from patients undergoing elective fetal anatomic surveys. Special attention was paid to the profile view of the fetal face, and the maxillary bone was identified and measured. Results. Three hundred twenty-seven fetuses between 13 and 40 weeks’ gestation were scanned. The maxillary bone is seen as a rodlike structure; it is a part of the facial skeleton that allows the opening and closing of the pharynx. A linear growth function was observed across gestational age (GA), and first-degree correlation was found to exist between GA and the maxillary bone (r = .645; P < .0001; y = 7.78 + 0.18 x GA). Significant correlation was also found between the maxillary bone and biparietal diameter (BPD) (r = 0.652; P > .0001; y = 8.36 + 0.66 x BPD), head circumference (HC) (r = .645; P < .0001; y = 8.39 + 0.18 x HC), femoral bone length (FBL) (r = .640; P < .0001; y = 9.28 + 0.7 x FBL), and abdominal circumference (AC) (r = .640; P < .0001; y = 8.91 + 0.17 x AC). Conclusions. Normative data for ultrasonographic measurements of the fetal maxillary bone throughout pregnancy are provided. These data potentially allow the prenatal diagnosis of abnormal maxillary bone length.

Key Words: fetus • maxillary bone • prenatal diagnosis • ultrasonography

Abbreviations: AC, abdominal circumference • BPD, biparietal diameter • FBL, femoral bone length • GA, gestational age • HC, head circumference







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.