JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odibo, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Macones, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odibo, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Macones, G. A.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:1223-1228 • 0278-4297

Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Evaluating the Impact of Using Gestational Age–Specific Reference Values

Anthony O. Odibo, MD, Christopher Riddick, Emmanuelle Pare, MD, David M. Stamilio, MD, MSCE and George A. Macones, MD, MSCE

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA.

Address correspondence to Anthony O. Odibo, MD, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 2000 Ravdin Courtyard, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA. E-mail: aodibo{at}obgyn.upenn.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of using gestational age–specific reference levels of the cerebroplacental Doppler ratio (CPR) with categorical threshold in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted pregnancies. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of cases of intrauterine growth restriction over a 3-year period was conducted. The umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility indices were converted to CPRs. The efficacy of using gestational age–specific reference levels of CPRs in predicting adverse outcomes was compared with the use of a CPR of less than 1.08. Adverse perinatal outcomes evaluated included cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tones, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7.0, intraventricular hemorrhage greater than grade 2, periventricular leukomalacia, respiratory distress syndrome, and perinatal death. Results. Of 183 pregnancies meeting our inclusion criteria, there were 70 with at least 1 adverse outcome. With the use of a CPR ratio below the 5th percentile for gestational age, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for predicting an adverse outcome were 65%, 73%, 73%, and 65%, respectively, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5.2 (1.4–19.4; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69). With a CPR threshold of less than 1.08, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 72%, 62%, 68%, and 67%, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 4.2 (1.2–15.3; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.67). Conclusions. An abnormal CPR is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted fetuses. The accuracy of using gestational age–specific reference levels was similar to that of using a categorical threshold.

Key Words: adverse outcomes • cerebral Doppler sonography • fetal growth restriction • umbilical artery Doppler sonography

Abbreviations: CPR, cerebroplacental Doppler ratio • IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction • MCA, middle cerebral artery • ROC, receiver operating characteristic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. S. Kleinman
Fetal Cardiac Intervention: Innovative Therapy or a Technique in Search of an Indication?
Circulation, March 21, 2006; 113(11): 1378 - 1381.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.