JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hendler, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sorokin, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hendler, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sorokin, Y.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:1205-1209 • 0278-4297

Suboptimal Second-Trimester Ultrasonographic Visualization of the Fetal Heart in Obese Women

Should We Repeat the Examination?

Israel Hendler, MD, Sean C. Blackwell, MD, Emmanuel Bujold, MD, Marjorie C. Treadwell, MD, Pooja Mittal, MD, Robert J. Sokol, MD and Yoram Sorokin, MD

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan USA.

Address correspondence to Israel Hendler, MD, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI 48201 USA. E-mail: ihendler{at}med.wayne.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a repeated antenatal ultrasound examination improves fetal cardiac visualization for the obese and nonobese population. Methods. A computerized ultrasound database (October 1999–June 2003) was used to identify singleton pregnancies undergoing repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations because of initial suboptimal ultrasonographic visualization (SUV) of the 4-chamber view, outflow tracts, or both. Women with maternal diabetes, abnormal maternal serum screening results, or known fetal anomalies at the initial examination were excluded. Patients were classified by maternal body mass index (BMI): less than 30 kg/mg2 (nonobese), 30 to 34.9 kg/mg2 (class I obesity), 35 to 39.9 kg/mg2 (class II obesity), and 40 kg/mg2 or greater (morbid obesity). The association between maternal BMI and SUV of the fetal heart was analyzed. Results. Three hundred seventy-two patients were abstracted from the database. The median gestational age was 19.0 weeks at the initial visit (range, 18.0–21.9 weeks) and 21.4 weeks at the second visit (range, 18.9–23.9 weeks). The median BMI was 32.6 kg/m2 (range, 16.4–58.7 kg/m2). Sixty-three percent of patients were obese (BMI ≥30). Cardiac anatomy continued to have SUV in 11% of the women. The rate of SUV was associated with the obesity class (1.5% for nonobese, 12% for obesity I, 17% for obesity II, and 20% for morbid obesity; P < .0001). A cardiac anomaly was found in 1 of 372 repeated examinations (arteriovenous canal defect) for a patient with BMI of 24.8 kg/m2. Conclusions. Repeated ultrasound examination for SUV of the fetal heart at a later gestational age dramatically reduces SUV. However, obese patients continue to have much higher rates of persistent SUV.

Key Words: body mass index • fetal cardiac anomalies • maternal obesity • prenatal ultrasonography • suboptimal ultrasonographic visualization

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index • SUV, suboptimal ultrasonographic visualization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
E. C. Toy, A. I. Montealegre, L. P. Fernandez, K. P. Harms, and A. L. Kaplan
Is Fetal Anatomic Assessment on Follow-up Antepartum Sonograms Clinically Useful?
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2007; 26(9): 1175 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. M. Nelson and R. F. Fleming
The preconceptual contraception paradigm: obesity and infertility
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 912 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.