JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larijani, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larijani, B.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimi, E.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:941-946 • 0278-4297

Correlation of Quantitative Heel Ultrasonography With Central Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometric Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women

Bagher Larijani, MD, Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh, MD, Shahriar Aghakhani, MD, Mojtaba Sedaghat, MD, Zohreh Hamidi, MD and Eiman Rahimi, MD

Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center (B.L., S.A., M.S., Z.H., E.R.), Shariati Hospital (M.H.D.), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Address correspondence to Bagher Larijani, MD, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Fifth Floor, Tehran 14114, Iran. E-mail: emrc{at}sina.tums.ac.ir

Objectives. In this study, we sought the proper cutoff level for quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) of the heel in identifying bone mineral density (BMD) categories as determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in postmenopausal women. Methods. With the use of DXA, BMD categories of the lumbar spine and different areas of the left femur of 420 healthy women according to World Health Organization definitions were determined. Quantitative ultrasonography of the heel was also performed in each subject. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and sensitivity and specificity of QUS to diagnose osteoporosis were examined at different points to identify the best cutoff level. The diagnostic agreement between the two techniques in identifying osteoporosis was assessed with {kappa} scores. Results. The {kappa} scores were 0.31 for the lumbar region and 0.5 for the femoral neck region. On the receiver operating characteristic study, a score of –1 was found to be the appropriate cutoff point for QUS studies, in which the sensitivity of QUS to diagnose BMD osteoporosis varied between 78% and 87.5% depending on the site of the DXA study. With the proposed cutoff point (–1), sensitivity and specificity of QUS in detecting osteoporosis at the lumbar spine were 83.9% and 51%, respectively, and at the femoral neck were 84% and 50%, respectively. Conclusions. Insufficient agreement between QUS and DXA led to uncertainty on expected BMD in people tested by QUS. The proposed cutoff value could achieve higher sensitivity but only by accepting higher rates of false-positive results.

Key Words: bone mineral density • dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry • menopause • osteoporosis • quantitative ultrasonography

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density • CI, confidence interval • DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry • QUS, quantitative ultrasonography • WHO, World Health Organization

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.