|
|
||||||||
|
by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine J Ultrasound Med 24:817-828 0278-4297 The Fetal ArmIndividualized Growth Assessment in Normal PregnanciesDivision of Fetal Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan USA (W.L., B.M.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas USA (R.L.D.); Perinatology Research Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland USA (W.L., L.F.G., J.E., R.R.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan USA (W.L., L.F.G., J.E., T.C., R.R.); and Division of Biostatistics, William Beaumont Hospital Research Institute, Royal Oak, Michigan USA (M.B.). Address correspondence to Wesley Lee, MD, Division of Fetal Imaging, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W Thirteen Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6769 USA. E-mail: wlee{at}beaumont.edu
Objective. The goals were to introduce fractional arm volume (AVol) as a new soft tissue parameter of fetal growth assessment and to develop individualized growth standards, based on Rossavik models, for AVol, midarm circumference (ArmC), and humeral diaphysis length (HDL). Methods. A prospective longitudinal study of 22 fetuses was conducted using 2- and 3-dimensional sonography. Three new growth parameters (HDL, ArmC, and AVol) were used to establish individualized standards for arm growth with the use of Rossavik functions [P = c(t)k + s(t), where P is the anatomic parameter; c, k, and s are model coefficients; and t is the time variable]. Second-trimester models were specified from the linear slopes of growth curves before approximately 28.0 menstrual weeks. For a given fetus, normal third-trimester trajectories were predicted for each parameter. Observed and predicted measurements were compared by percent deviations. Results. Rossavik functions fit all parameter trajectories extremely well (R2 = 95.7%99.4%). By fixing coefficients k at their mean values, their respective fits did not change, and the variabilities of both coefficients c and s were reduced. Coefficient c was also significantly related to second-trimester slope, as was s to c, for all 3 parameters (R2 = 97.7%98.7%; P < .0001). Mean percent deviations between observed and predicted third-trimester HDL, ArmC, and AVol measurements were 0.1% ± 2.9%, 0.5% ± 4.6%, and 0.4% ± 8.5%, respectively. Conclusions. Individualized growth assessment, using HDL and ArmC, can accurately predict normal arm growth during the third trimester of pregnancy. AVol may also allow earlier detection and improved monitoring of soft tissue abnormalities that can occur in fetuses with growth disturbances.
Key Words: fetal growth intrauterine growth restriction Rossavik growth model 3-dimensional sonography Abbreviations: AC, abdominal circumference ArmC, midarm circumference AVol, fractional arm volume CHL, crown-heel length FDL, femoral diaphysis length GPRI, Growth Potential Realization Index HC, head circumference HDL, humeral diaphysis length IGA, individualized growth assessment IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction m3NGAS51, modified Neonatal Growth Assessment Score SP, start point ThC, thigh circumference WT, weight This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |